Annotated wireframes
Panel review
Switch panels to focus on one screen at a time. The default view shows the first screen because it drives most downstream completion risk.
Decision log
What to change now
| Item | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Intro CTA stack | Reduce to one primary action | Current screen introduces choice anxiety before commitment. |
| Photo upload timing | Move after home basics | Photos feel high effort before hosts feel progress. |
| Rule chips | Add helper text and grouping | Hosts need to understand how these settings affect match quality. |
| Progress indicator | Show task names, not just numbers | Numbers alone do not communicate remaining effort. |
Alternatives considered
What we are not doing
Alternative A: single long scroll form
Rejected. It exposes every decision at once and makes host onboarding feel heavier, especially on mobile.
Alternative B: ask for photos first to increase listing quality
Rejected for first-time hosts. This likely improves final listing quality but hurts top-of-funnel completion.
Alternative C: hide rules until after publish
Partially rejected. Some rules must be known before publish to prevent poor swap matches and low trust.
Unresolved question
Verification timing
Should identity verification happen before publish, or only before the first accepted swap request?
Unresolved question
Calendar defaults
Do hosts understand blocked dates better if we pre-fill the next 60 days as unavailable instead of blank?
Unresolved question
Trust messaging
Would a stronger privacy explainer on screen one improve progression to photo upload, or is it secondary to action clarity?
Compact recommendation
Next iteration
Keep the four-step architecture. Rework screen one to reduce choice overload, delay photos until after home basics, and borrow the publish screen's reassurance language earlier in the flow. That combination is the highest-confidence path to better completion without lowering host quality.